12 June 2003
The ANC has noted with appreciation that the Board of the SABC has, in accordance with the requirements of the Broadcasting Amendment Act, 2002, published its editorial Policies for comment by the public.
The ANC welcomes this important development and would like to commend the Board, Management and staff of the SABC for its effort in ensuring that this legal requirement is executed.
Our comments will deal with the areas covered by the published policies, which are as follows:
We have noted that the SABC intends to complete the process of engaging the public in the drafting of the Policies by 13 June 2003 and thereafter these policies will have to be submitted to ICASA as required by law.
As indicated above, the African National Congress (ANC) would like to congratulate the Board, Management and staff of the SABC for giving serious consideration and thought to the legislative requirement to produce draft policies for public discussion.
The promptness which the SABC has displayed in this undertaking demonstrates, in our belief, an understanding of the important role the SABC plays in our national life.
Broadcasting will continue to be a field of activity, which deserves just as much attention and discussion as education, defence, health and other sectors that are primarily concerned with public interest. In broadcasting, just like in these other sectors, it would be unthinkable to rely solely on the market forces to ensure the provision of services in an inclusive manner reaching all South Africans.
Public broadcasting for a foreseeable future will be directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of our society and its quest to include all South Africans in socio-political developments that characterise the transition to a democratic society.
The SABC as a public broadcaster plays a fundamental role within the broadcasting dispensation as there is no other media whose main objective is to help build a democratic public space as a venue for producing mutual understanding of South Africans. In a system which is inevitably influenced by market forces, the SABC plays an important role to promote the cultural development on which the quality of public and democratic life that includes and reaches all South Africans depends.
The importance of key policy considerations that drive the SABC is fundamental within this context. It is imperative that society as whole must reach a consensus on the role of the Public Broadcaster in our society. More importantly, society as whole must understand how the SABC, as the Public Broadcaster, seeks to discharge its responsibilities towards the South African citizens, giving concrete meaning to the many constitutional provisions that bestow the rights to receive and disseminate information.
The availability of editorial policies will go a long way in ensuring a detailed understanding of the role and obligations of the SABC. The absence of detailed policies and programme guidelines has hindered the task of communicating, in a consistent manner, the mandate of public services, core values, principles and philosophy. The non-availability of the SABC editorial policies has made it impossible to talk about a consistent value-driven approach to serving the different audience needs.
It has made it difficult to understand the standards that the general public must expect from SABC services and hence the different perceptions on what the SABC should and should not do.
The publication of the Editorial Policies for public discussion is against this backdrop a welcome development. It is another milestone in the transformation of the Public Broadcasting system as part of the consistent efforts to free the airwaves and give meaning to the fundamental right to freedom of expression as enshrined in the Constitution.
The Editorial policies published for public discussion serve as a model for public policy development with respect to the media in the context of our transition, globalisation and new technologies.
Within this context it is important to state some fundamental assumptions with respect to what it is that the Editorial policies ought to do in order for them to be judged as addressing themselves to the constitutional, legal and societal expectations.
“I take it as axiomatic that some version of communicative action lies at the heart of both theory and practice of democracy. The rights and duties of a citizen are in large part defined in terms of freedom of assembly and freedom to impart and receive information. Without such freedoms it would be impossible for citizens to posses the knowledge of the views of others necessary to reach agreements between themselves, whether consensual or majoritarian, as to either social means or ends; to posses knowledge of the actions of those to whom executive responsibilities are delegated so as to make them accountable; to posses knowledge of the external environment necessary to arrive at appropriate judgment of both personal and societal interests.” (Garnham, 1996: 364)
Judged against these assumptions, it is important to note that the draft policies have to a great extent achieved what they sought to achieve. The Draft Policies link the role of the SABC to the Constitution, emphasise its socio-cultural nature as offering a public service and underscore the SABC’s mandate to treat all South Africans equitably in terms of language and its reach. The Draft Policies also address the role of the SABC as a news and current affairs provider, the tool through which the public relies for information that make its possible for them to participate as citizens in the democratic process. In this sense we congratulate the SABC.
However, there are still areas that warrant further interrogation. Some of these relate to the crafting of the document, content, policy approach and in some instances to what still needs to be included in order for the policies to be comprehensive. The comments provided hereunder must be understood within this context as a contribution to media policy development to achieve a public broadcaster that is in line with South African needs and aspirations.
1.1 It is noted that the Policy on the mandate of the SABC recognises the
legal and regulatory provisions.
1.2 Reference to the provisions of the legislative and regulatory provisions
is illustrated.
1.3 In as much as it is a welcome development to note that the SABC has
taken into account all the legislative and regulatory provisions which have
an impact on the operations of the SABC, it is important to ensure that
the provisions of these legal documents are reflected in all the policy
areas which are to guide the operations of the SABC as outlined.
1.4 The practical difficulty with this approach is that when discussing
the Mandate of the SABC one is forced to cross-refer to many documents,
pieces of legislation and regulations.
1.5 The omission of a reference to the Constitutional provision of freedom
of expression is an oversight as this provision is the fundamental departure
point for the legislation, regulations and other provisions covering the
operations of the SABC.
Recommendations:
2.1 Reference to the values of the Constitution and their link to the SABC’s role is important.
Recommendation:
3.1 The policy on the Editorial Code commits the SABC, as part of its contribution
to nation building and strong democracy, to providing information that is
relevant, reliable and newsworthy to enable South Africans to make informed
decisions. Given this broad commitment, it is important for the policy to
recognise the diverse nature of the South African public and therefore calls
for a system that is able to service all these needs.
3.2 The recognition of the diverse nature of the South African public will
enable the SABC to commit itself to reaching South Africans regardless of,
amongst others, location.
3.3 This view is based on the concern that the needs of some sectors of
the South African Society are currently not given the necessary coverage
when compared to others. The following examples demonstrate this inequality
of expression through our public broadcaster:
3.4 The SABC mandate calls upon the SABC to reflect South Africa and its
regions. It is imperative that an appropriate balance is achieved, in policy
and its implementation, in information programming between the national
and regional needs. Such balance must extend to information about the rural
and urban areas of the country. Current practice, in terms of news provision,
demonstrates a heavy bias towards the region where the Head Quarters of
the SABC is located. Overall the SABC reports more about events and developments
in the urban areas as opposed to developments in the rural and peri-urban
areas.
3.5 Having outlined the above-mentioned disparities, it is necessary for
the policy to include a precise statement on what the SABC will do to provide
for the information needs of those who are currently not adequately serviced
by the system.
3.6 The ability of the public to make informed decisions relies heavily
on the availability of information that provides a comprehensive and total
picture of developments around them. In so far as the media provides a partial
view of developments and reports selectively, the ability of the public
to make informed decision is compromised. In this respect policy must commit
the SABC to providing a comprehensive picture of the socio-political developments
taking place in our country. This comprehensive picture will include the
good and bad news, successes and failures. To a large extent many important
developments in our society do not achieve coverage because they are deemed
not eye-catching or newsworthy. To this category belong many policy interventions
and developments that have transformed the lives of many South Africans.
Yet because they do not attract any controversies they go unreported. As
a result of this selectivity what most often find space in the media reports
are the controversies, contestations as if our society is bereft of any
achievements. It is imperative for the SABC policy to commit to providing
a total picture in an unbiased and impartial manner.
3.7 The Code also commits the SABC to upholding its core values in the commissioning,
production, acquisitioning and broadcasting of programmes. This particular
commitment is a welcome development as this particular area of SABC’s
operation has always attracted public interest
3.8 There is therefore a need to commit in the Code to transparent measures
relating to the acquisition, commissioning and production of broadcasting
programmes. It is also important for the policy to display its commitment
to national policies such as:
3.9 The Editorial Code notes SABC’s awareness of the danger of discrimination
being furthered by broadcasting as a medium and commits the SABC to avoid
promoting discrimination through its programmes. Given the background of
our country and the discrimination that has been meted to a large percentage
of South Africans on the grounds enumerated in the Code it is imperative
that the Code commits the SABC to redress this situation through active
public education in its programming.
3.10 The policy also commits to upholding the principle of Journalistic
freedom by the SABC and says the SABC sees the protection of journalist’s
source as an important part of the principle of journalistic freedom. The
notion of protection of the journalist’s freedom raises no problem.
However the extension of this notion to include the refusal by the SABC
to obey the law, as happened in instances when police request access to
information for their official duties raises fundamental problems. The SABC
must at all times obey the law and must be seen to be upholding public law
and order. The Code must specifically commit the SABC to cooperating with
all relevant authorities in the upholding and maintenance of law and order.
3.11 The phrasing of the respect to the legitimate right to privacy poses
some problems. In the current formulation the SABC confines the right to
privacy to grief and distress yet this right extends far beyond these aspects.
It would be preferable if the Code would commit the SABC to respect the
privacy of individuals including all private behaviour, correspondence and
conversations.
Recommendations:
3.1 Editorial Responsibility and Upward Referral
3.1.1 We note that this policy, in as far as Editorial Responsibility and Upward referral is concerned, is consistent with adopted international practice and commend the SABC for ensuring that the South African situation follows an international practice in matters of this nature.
Recommendations:
4.1 The programming Policy as published is a welcome development and we
appreciate the SABC’s effort in developing this Policy. However, we
believe that the Policy needs to provide for effective mechanism to monitor
implementation. The current policy document makes generalized statements
without providing for mechanisms to translate these statements into concrete
deliverables.
4.2 The Programming Policy is silent on how it aims to take into account
gender imperatives.
Recommendations:
4.2 Programming Complaints
4.2.1 We have noted that the policy contains mechanisms for the lodging of programme complaints but suggests that the SABC must consider appointing an ombudsperson to act as a liaison official between the SABC and the Public in all matters relating to Programme complaints.
Recommendation:
- It is recommended that the SABC appoint an Ombudsperson to deal with complaints lodged by the public.
5.1 The spirit and the commitments of the SABC in relation to this policy
is commendable. We wish to state that we commend the policy provisions relating
to the requirement that SABC’s staff will uphold the highest level
of professional and ethical standards.
5.2 We recommend that the policy should not merely state the SABC’s
commitment to maintaining the highest standards of professionalism but also
make provisions for the training and development of its journalists so as
to maintain the highest professional and ethical standards.
5.3 We note with appreciation the SABC’s commitment to seek balance
by presenting relevant views on matters of importance. The policy further
states that this commitment may not be achieved in a single news bulletin
or programme but should be done within a reasonable time.
5.4 This particular commitment is not clear in the following respect;
5.5 The Policy document commits the SABC to “ … report,
contextualise, and present news and current affairs honestly by striving
to disclose all the essential facts and by not suppressing relevant, available
facts, or by distorting by wrong or improper emphasis.” This
is to be welcomed as any journalist organization, to achieve balance and
fairness, should ensure that a widest possible range of views is expressed
honestly and properly contexualised. However, this value as presently articulated
may in itself lead to the creation of a wrong perception that a strand of
thought that is unpopular will as a result of this value be accorded the
same status and presented as equal to a significant consensus in society.
There is a definite need for policy to recognize the need for SABC to take
proper account of the weight of opinion that holds any views, its significance
or potential significance. The SABC programmes dealing with differing points
of views must supplement the articulation of one point of view with an equitable
treatment of other relevant points of views. Equitable in this context must
mean taking into consideration the weight of opinion behind a point of view,
as well as its significance or potential significance.
5.6 On many occasions, representation of a single point of view on matters
of considerable importance is reported in the news without any reference
to the opposing viewpoint. In most of the instances this viewpoint, on a
basis of a media statement is reported on as if it is factual information.
In some instances responses to government initiatives and policies are reported
without the government initiative having been reported. These instances
are examples in which the important principles of fairness and balance are
routinely ignored. It is our submission that policy must commit the SABC
journalists to ensuring that appropriate representation of all point of
views are catered for.
5.7 The Policy document commits the SABC to “… offer information
that is substantial, and analysis that is authentic and meaningful to ordinary,
inquiring South Africans so that they can form their own opinions.”
This commitment is to be welcomed. However the SABC should go beyond the
provision of information to those who are already seeking particular information
and insights. The SABC, to a large degree, is the only media contact that
a large section of the population has, as such must include as part of its
provision information that the public is entitled and needs to know.
5.8 The policy document commits the SABC to covering other events, which
may include major parliamentary debates, the opening of provincial national
and provincial parliaments. Parliament plays an important role in term of
our Constitutional order as such deserves more coverage than what has been
allocated. In addition, coverage of parliament has often concentrated on
the National Assembly. The National Council of Provinces ahs received no
significant coverage. A comprehensive coverage of parliament should include
coverage of both Houses.
5.9 The News, Current Affairs and Information Policy is silent on a number
of important issues as they pertain to news and information. These would
include:
5.10 An issue that warrants mention is the issue of manipulation of audiences.
Policy provides for a prohibition on the abuse of the powerful position
programme personnel occupy to paddle their own points of views. This must
be supplemented by a provision that the audience must not be incited by
SABC program personnel to express itself in the form of communications to
elected representatives, institutions, commercial enterprises or individuals,
or by attendance at meetings and demonstrations with a view to exerting
pressure to seek changes in public policy or to support a particular point
of view. Such actions would in effect make the Corporation a party to controversy
and would be contrary to the premise that the Corporation takes no editorial
position in its programming.
5.11 The News and Current Affairs Policy commits the SABC to providing the
full spectrum of opinions, perspectives and comment as it applies to the
selection of guests, analysts and special commentators. However, experience
continues to show that not all segments and sections of our population are
adequately reflected in programming. It is imperative that a clear policy
statement must commit the SABC to the reflection and representation of people
from all backgrounds. Policy must articulate ways and means through which
the SABC will ensure that people from the underrepresented sections are
drawn upon as participants in all the SABC programmes.
Recommendations:
6.1 We have noted the commitments of the SABC towards language broadcasting
in particular covering of programmes in indigenous languages of the Republic.
6.2 We believe that the policy as it stands may be viewed to be lacking
in detail and on that recommend that the policy should commit to the following:
Recommendations:
The Language Policy should commit to the following:
7.1 The commitments contained in this Policy are commendable but we have noted that the Policy omits to make provisions for access to broadcasting by blind persons.
7.2 The Broadcasting Amendment Act provides that the South African Broadcasting System must be responsive to the needs of all South Africans including the needs of the deaf and the blind and must account on how they meet those needs.
7.3 This policy is expected to give effect to this legal requirement and therefore, it is expected that this policy must contain practical measures on how to meet the needs of the deaf and the blind persons.
7.4 We recommend that the SABC must consider closed captioning as a mechanism to deal with the needs of the Blind persons.
Recommendations: