What the media says
Accompanied by others working in government, I left our country on Saturday, 24 November, travelling to the United States. We left for Annapolis to attend the international conference convened to restart the negotiations to resolve the painful and protracted Israel-Palestine conflict.
We attended the Annapolis conference in response to the formal invitation of the convenor of the conference, the US government. When we arrived in the United States we read a report in The Sunday Independent, written by Peter Fabricius, entitled "'Unhelpful' SA gets belated invitation to peace talks".
In his article Fabricius said: "After long uncertainty, the United States has invited South Africa to participate in the Middle East peace conference... Diplomatic sources had said that the US was not keen to invite South Africa because it was considered 'unhelpful' in international organisations - largely because of its votes against US positions in the UN. The US would also have regarded South Africa as unsympathetic to Israel, a key US ally".
"But it is believed that South Africa received an ex-officio invitation as a current member of the Security Council."
South Africa and the Middle East
As Fabricius said, indeed the President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, had told President Thabo Mbeki that it was important that our country should be represented at the peace conference. At the same time, over the years the Israeli governments have insisted on the necessity for our country and government to be actively involved in the search for peace between Palestine and Israel.
I have also been present at meetings between Presidents Thabo Mbeki and George W Bush when the Israel-Palestine question was discussed. At all times President Bush has insisted that he and the rest of the US government are determined to be open with us with regard to this issue. This has also characterised my own interaction with the US Secretary of State, even though our governments have held different views on this important issue.
Contrary to what The Sunday Independent said, the timing of the invitation to us to attend the Annapolis conference was not determined by any US consideration that we are 'unhelpful' or that we are 'unsympathetic to Israel'.
It depended on the assessment whether sufficient preparatory work had been done to ensure that to one degree or another there was any possibility for the Annapolis conference meaningfully to restart the Palestine-Israel negotiations.
We fully understood this concern, which we shared with the Palestinian Authority, the people of Palestine and the rest of the Arab world. Because we understood this reality, we were therefore ready to respond at short notice to the invitation to attend the peace conference, knowing that a short notice might be unavoidable.
The 'diplomatic sources' on whom, in part, Fabricius relied, were entirely wrong in their assessment that South Africa had been invited 'at the last minute', because we were 'unhelpful' with regard to any matter. I leave it to Fabricius to explain what an "ex-officio invitation" is. What I know personally is that we received an invitation to attend the Annapolis conference, no different from the invitation received by many other countries and delegations.
Annapolis
We are convinced that the process started at Annapolis is of the greatest importance. This is born of the decades-long desire and commitment of our movement, the ANC, that the Palestine-Israel conflict should be solved, among other things making it possible for the creation of a sovereign State of Palestine.
It is most unfortunate that some within our media chose to carry such misguided reports as the Fabricius article, which seek to detract from the vital importance of the Annapolis initiative and the obligations our country has in this regard, arising from the fact of its participation at the Annapolis peace conference. Such is the result of the obsession to oppose our government and movement at every twist and turn.
As we sat listening to the statements made at the Annapolis conference on 27 November, we could not but appreciate the importance of the moment. In this regard, I hope that our media will help to inform our people about the essence and intention of the Annapolis process.
The cultivation of a proper understanding of this process does not deserve to suffer from petty considerations such as those that inspired the false assertion about an 'unhelpful' South Africa.
To enable our people to understand that the search for peace in Palestine, Israel and the Middle East has reached a critical moment, I can only give a mere suggestion of what happened at Annapolis. I would like to thank the Editor of ANC Today for giving me the opportunity to submit this article to provide even a limited bird's eye view.
The US commitment
In his opening statement, the host, President Bush said: "We meet to lay the foundation for the establishment of a new nation - a democratic Palestinian state that will live side by side with Israel in peace and security. We meet to help bring an end to the violence that has been the true enemy of the aspirations of both the Israelis and Palestinians...
"The task begun here at Annapolis will be difficult. This is the beginning of the process, not the end of it - and no doubt a lot of work remains to be done. Yet the parties can approach this work with confidence. The time is right. The cause is just. And with hard effort, I know they can succeed.
"President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert, I pledge to devote my effort during my time as President to do all I can to help you achieve this ambitious goal. I give you my personal commitment to support your work with the resources and resolve of the American government. I believe a day is coming when freedom will yield the peace we desire. And the land that is holy to so many will see the light of peace."
Anyone who has studied the approach of the current US Administration towards the Israel-Palestine issue since it came into office will understand the significance of these words, which were uttered in the presence of many representatives of the international community.
Joint Statement
President Bush was also given the responsibility to read out a critically important joint statement of commitment agreed by the leaders of Israel and Palestine, represented by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Mahmoud Abbas. In part this Statement said:
"We express our determination to bring an end to bloodshed, suffering and decades of conflict between our peoples; to usher in a new era of peace, based on freedom, security, justice, dignity, respect and mutual recognition, to propagate a culture of peace and non-violence; to confront terrorism and incitement, whether committed by Palestinians or Israelis.
"In furtherance of the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security, we agree to immediately launch good-faith bilateral negotiations in order to conclude a peace treaty, resolving all outstanding issues, including all core issues without exception, as specified in previous agreements.
"We agree to engage in vigorous, ongoing and continuous negotiations, and shall make every effort to conclude an agreement before the end of 2008."
The Palestinian commitment
In his intervention, President Mahmoud Abbas said: "Tomorrow, we have to start comprehensive and deep negotiations on all issues of final status, including Jerusalem, refugees, borders, settlements, water and security and others.
"We have to support this negotiating process in concrete and direct steps on the ground that would prove that we are moving in an irreversible path toward negotiated, comprehensive and full peace, and to ensure ending all settlement activities including natural growth, and reopening closed Jerusalem institutions, removal of settlement outposts, removal of road blocks, and freedom of prisoners, and to facilitate our mission in the authority to enforce law and the rule of law.
"Here, I must defend in all sincerity and candour, and without wavering, the right of our people to see a new dawn, without occupation, without settlement, without separation walls, without prisons where thousands of prisoners are detained, without assassinations, without siege, without barriers around villages ...
"Each one of us must pitch in our weight and experience and sense of resolve in order to overcome the obstacles that we will face and to close the gaps between our positions in a bid to achieve a solution that would end occupation and the long years of suffering of the refugees and ensure good neighbour relations, economic cooperation, humanitarian openness so that all of them would ensure guarantees for peace that are stronger than any documents, commitments or pledges, despite the importance of these all ..
"Those who say that peace-making between us is impossible, actually does not need except to perpetuate this conflict toward the unknown, but it is, we all know, in other words, that continuation of bloodshed for many decades to come. After that, we would not reach the solution proposed today, all of which we know, all its components and elements. Or the ideal of peace would be killed in the hearts and minds.
"Indeed, peace is possible but it requires our common efforts so that we could make it and preserve it."
The Israeli commitment
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert then said: "I wish to say, from the bottom of my heart, that I know and acknowledge the fact that alongside the constant suffering which many in Israel have experienced because of the history, the wars, the terror and the hatred towards us - a suffering which has always been part of our lives in our land - your people have also suffered for many years, and some still suffer.
"For dozens of years, many Palestinians have been living in camps, disconnected from the environment in which they grew, wallowing in poverty, neglect, alienation, bitterness, and a deep, unrelenting sense of deprivation.
"I know that this pain and deprivation is one of the deepest foundations which formented the ethos of hatred towards us.
"We are not indifferent to this suffering. We are not oblivious to the tragedies you have experienced. I believe that in the course of negotiations between us we will find the right way, as part of an international effort in which we will participate, to assist these Palestinians in finding a proper framework for their future, in the Palestinian state which will be established in the territories agreed upon between us. Israel will be part of an international mechanism which will assist in finding a solution to this problem ...
"It will address all the issues which have thus far been evaded. We will do it directly, openly and courageously. We will not avoid any subject, we will deal with all the core issues. I have no doubt that the reality created in our region in 1967 will change significantly. While this will be an extremely difficult process for many of us, it is nevertheless inevitable. I know it. Many of my people know it. We are ready for it.
"The negotiations will be based on previous agreements between us, UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the Roadmap and the April 14th 2004 letter of President Bush to the Prime Minister of Israel".
Prayer for a lasting peace
I have cited the extracts from the speeches made by Presidents Bush and Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert to indicate the seriousness with which the principal actors in the Israel-Palestine peace process are approaching the initiative represented by the Annapolis conference.
The extracts I have quoted also state the matter plainly that the process begun at Annapolis, which is planned to conclude by the end of 2008, will address all the "final status issues", the matters that have proved to be the most difficult. At the same time, without the resolution of these issues, there can be no final settlement.
We all know that the forthcoming negotiations will be very difficult. We know that many among the Palestinians, the Israelis, the Arab world and elsewhere are very sceptical about the possibility for the negotiations to succeed. We also know that even as the negotiations proceed, the conflict that has claimed far too many lives already will continue.
To conclude his speech, President Abbas said: "May I close by recalling some words of Abraham Lincoln in one of the darkest moments of American history? 'Let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to do all which we may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.'"
It is not that long ago that we addressed this same prayer to ourselves, as we engaged in our own process of negotiations. Today our collective national and sacred duty is to do everything in our power to support the peoples of Palestine and Israel as they embark on the difficult road to arrive at "a just and lasting peace among (themselves) and with all nations", as we did in our own negotiations which started in 1990 and only concluded in 1996, when we adopted our "final" Constitution.
** Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma is a member of the ANC National Executive Committee (NEC) and Minister of Foreign Affairs. |