|
|
| |
| Volume 4, No. 22 4— 10 June 2004 |
| THIS WEEK:
|
|
After our first democratic elections in 1994, the New National Party (NNP) emerged as a much larger party than the then Democratic Party (DP). This situation changed after the 1999 elections, with the DP overtaking the NNP. The 2004 elections have confirmed the former DP, now the Democratic Alliance (DA), as by far the bigger of the two. The DA now proudly proclaims - the NNP is dead: the DA lives! For almost the entire period of the colonisation of our country, the two political tendencies represented by these two parties, the one "conservative" and the other "liberal", have competed against each other for the allegiance of the white population of our country. (This struggle is detailed in the book, "A Marriage made in Heaven".) Throughout the period of colonialism and apartheid, the "conservative" tendency succeeded to maintain itself as the dominant force. But, seemingly, democracy has opened the doors for the "liberal" tendency to triumph, as represented by the victory of the DA over the NNP. We have borrowed the title of this Letter from the novel by Charles Dickens, 'A Tale of Two Cities'. The novel begins with the famous words: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way." Clearly, for the DA, the age of democracy is the best of times, and the worst of times for the NNP. For the DA it is the season of Light and the spring of hope, and the season of Darkness and the winter of despair for the NNP. Undoubtedly, the DA believes that it has everything before it, going direct to Heaven, while the NNP has nothing before it, going direct the other way -to Hell. However, for us and for our country, this is nothing but an optical illusion, the product of a conjurer's trick, which has transformed a season of Darkness into a season of Light, the winter of despair into the spring of hope. The sleight of hand that has produced the illusion consists in the fact that the DA has managed to retain the label "liberal", while transforming itself into a "conservative" party. From 1994, as the DP, it set out to win the support of the traditional supporters of the NNP, continuing the age-old struggle between the "conservative" and "liberal" tendencies in white politics. To succeed in this venture, as it has, it had to present itself to the historical base of the NNP as the authentic representative of the "conservative" tradition, asserting that the NNP no longer was. To maintain the support of its own traditional base, it had to continue to project a "liberal" face, which it could claim the NNP never had. To emerge as the dominant voice of white South Africa, as it has, it had to be both "liberal" and "conservative", liberal in its rhetoric and conservative in its substance. It had to perpetuate the dominance of the "conservative" tendency in white politics, while pretending that it had not abandoned its historic "liberal" mission. Like Oscar Wilde's Dorian Gray, "in hypocrisy, it (has) worn the mask of goodness." The ANC Deputy Chief Whip in the National Assembly, Andries Nel, discussed some of this in his response to the State of the Nation Address on May 26. Among other things he said: "(Mr Leon) says, 'The DA agrees on the need for radical and fundamental change. But the policy of transformation, as the ANC defines it, aims at something more. The goal of this transformation is to achieve "representivity" - a state of affairs in which every institution, public and private, reflects the demographics of South Africa as a whole.' "If Mr. Leon is suggesting that we should perpetuate apartheid by agreeing to a situation where some institutions, public and private, are left to be unrepresentative, then clearly we disagree on more than just means. How does one argue for radical and fundamental change in our context and at the same time oppose attempts to make society as representative as possible? Who is Mr. Leon suggesting should remain unrepresented and in which institutions?" Of course, the answer to Andries Nel's question - how does one argue for fundamental change and oppose the deracialisation of our country? - is that this emanates from the need to be simultaneously "conservative" and "liberal". In his response to the State of the Nation Address, entitled "We agree on the ends; we disagree on the means", the leader of the DA also said, "Today, South Africa is living with a curious paradox: as the economic gap between black and white is shrinking, the political gap between black and white is growing. "The ballots (during the 2004 elections) revealed that South Africans are still deeply divided along racial lines. The DA had won approximately 75 percent of the vote in predominantly white voting districts, while the ANC won 82 percent of the vote in predominantly black areas." It was good that Mr Leon raised this matter himself because if we had done so, we would have been accused in strident voices of "playing the race card". But again we are back at the game of optical illusions. The figures quoted by Mr Leon suggest that the DA does significantly better than the ANC at attracting support from outside its principal base, the figures being 25% and 18% respectively. In absolute terms however, 482, 801 of the DA votes came from outside "predominantly white voting districts". With regard to the ANC, 1,958, 086 of its votes came from outside "predominantly black areas". In other words, DA support beyond its principal base amounted to a mere 24.65% of ANC support beyond its own principal base. All this confirms the success the DA has achieved in defining itself as essentially a white party, an objective it pursued when it decided to replace the NNP as the authentic representative of the white "conservative" tendency in our national life. By so doing, it provided a new home for this tendency, rather than secure the victory of "liberalism" over "conservatism". Two objective factors combined to bring about this DA victory, its partisan season of Light. One of these was the persisting "conservatism" of many among the white section of our population, making these susceptible to the traditional phobia of "die swart gevaar". The second was the fact that the NNP was engaged in a serious and determined effort to transform itself from a party of Afrikaner and white "liberation" into a new movement for the liberation of all South Africans. Thus, as the DA correctly determined, the NNP had taken the remarkable and historic decision to abandon its post as the champion of white "conservatism", and join the ranks of those who genuinely seek the "radical and fundamental change" the DA falsely claims to support. After the tabling of the final report of the TRC and therefore the conclusion of its work, the ANC and the NNP issued a joint statement, which, among other things, said: "The greater part of the period between (the beginning of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st) was characterised by socio-economic progress achieved at immense human cost, as well as a protracted struggle to resolve the question of how our diverse nation could live and work together, at peace with itself, sharing a common patrimony. "The African National Congress (ANC), formed in 1912, and the National Party (NP), formed in 1914, were at the centre of these processes, the principal protagonists in a contest that was only resolved in 1994. "The one represented the perspective of an inclusive African nationalism, and the other, that of an exclusive Afrikaner, and later, white nationalism." The statement then went on to say: "Throughout the 20th Century our political formations were the principal antagonists in the struggle to determine the future of our country. "In the 21st Century we shall work together to help build the new united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and prosperous South Africa to which the overwhelming majority of our people are committed. "We call on all South Africans of goodwill to join us on an exciting journey that will lead us to the birth of the humane, caring and peaceful society for which many South Africans sacrificed their lives. We owe this to ourselves and to future generations so that we transform our country into a beacon of hope in a turbulent world." Remarkably, the principal antagonists in the bitter struggle to determine the future of our country committed themselves to work together to build a new united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and prosperous South Africa. This represented a development that would not be easy to find in any other country. For it to succeed, required that one of the antagonists, the ANC, should commit itself in word and deed to the task of building the national unity and reconciliation for which the TRC had been created, forgiving the harm that had been done to our people in the name of white supremacy. It required that the other antagonist, the NNP, should also commit itself in word and deed to the task of building national unity and reconciliation, and thereby turn its back on the policies which, in the past, had divided our country into hostile and contending factions. The NNP took these positions because it understood the historic responsibility it had to the peoples of our country and the world to contribute to the eradication of the terrible legacy of its policies. For this reason, directed at the greater good for all South Africans, it took the courageous decision to put the interests of our country and people above its own selfish and partisan interests. Similarly, the ANC understood that, again in the interests of our country and people, it had to come together with those who had been its enemy to guarantee that never again should the different racial groups in our country see one another as opponents with mutually antagonistic aspirations. It too had to rise above any selfish and partisan interests that might have suggested that it should adopt a position of victorious triumphalism. A firm foundation has been laid for our country to make a new beginning, including bringing together the members and supporters of the ANC and the NNP into united action. For the ANC, the NNP and our people as a whole, this, indeed, is the best of times, the age of wisdom, the season of Light, the spring of hope, with everything before us. The white "conservatism" that had condemned our country to a future where we had nothing before us will never come to dominate our lives again. Its season of Light is, in reality, its season of Darkness.
|
![]() |
|
Government targets infrastructure backlog The task of rural development and urban renewal is challenging, but not insurmountable. This was the view of the cluster of cabinet ministers who briefed the media last week on government's programmes to address unemployment, poverty and underdevelopment in areas where people live. These programmes include the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme (ISRDP) and Urban Renewal Programme; Expanded Public Works Programme; Municipal Infrastructure Grant; the provision of housing; free basic services; and food security and land restitution. While these are national programmes, much of the focus is on the 21 rural and urban nodes identified by President Thabo Mbeki in his 2001 State of the Nation address as most in need of integrated and focused development. Infrastructure investment One of the major obstacles to development in these 21 nodal areas are massive backlogs in infrastructure. While government has spent over R10 million in this nodes in the last financial year, there is a need for greater infrastructure investment in these areas. This requires, among other things, building the capacity of provincial and local governments to make sure funds are effectively spent on infrastructure. Government is currently working on finalising a Financing Protocol for these nodes to help improve coordination between the national, provincial and local spheres of government. Government has allocated R45 billion over the next five years for municipal and provincial infrastructure grants. About a third of this, or R15 billion, will go towards the Expanded Public Works Programme, which was launched in Limpopo a few weeks ago. Through this programme, government will increase its investment in infrastructure through labour-intensive projects that create additional employment opportunities, and provide thousands of South Africans with skills and experience. A substantial amount of these projects will be located in the 21 nodal areas. One of the mechanisms for getting funds to where they are needed is the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) which merges a number of funding programmes from national level into a single grant to support councils' capital expenditure budgets. The grant, which will be officially launched next month to the tune of R15 billion, is aimed at providing and upgrading infrastructure required for a basic level of service, particularly to the poor. Its other chief emphasis is helping to create conditions for sustainable economic development at a local level. The grant has an overall target of removing the backlog with regard to access to basic municipal services over a 10-year period. Water and sanitation A central component of rural development and urban renewal is the provision, upgrading and maintenance of infrastructure for water and sanitation. Government will therefore work to ensure that within the next five years all households in South Africa will have easy access to clean running water. By December this year, ten million South Africans will have received access to clean and potable water through the work of ANC-led governments. During the current year more than 300,000 households will be provided with basic sanitation. However, there are still around 18.5 million people without access to adequate sanitation. The national government will continue to work with local councils to eradicate the bucket system while continuing to deliver sanitation in rural areas. Schools and clinics that do not have access to water will be provided with water tanks as an interim measure. Investment will also continue to go into major infrastructure projects aimed at ensuring sustained water security. Construction has already begun, for example, on the first phase of the Olifants River Development Project to meet the needs of Limpopo's agriculture and platinum mines. Construction has also begun on the Berg River project to meet the growing needs of the Cape Peninsula. Housing The provision of decent housing is particularly important for urban renewal and tackling poverty in these areas. As a result of the rapid rate of urbanisation over the last few years, the need for houses in most urban centres has increased dramatically. The current rate of housing delivery, around 190,000 houses a year, is therefore not enough to respond to the increased demand. This, together with a slow down in the rate of delivery in some areas, means that the pace of housing delivery needs to be increased and significant resources mobilised for investment in housing. Minister of Housing Lindiwe Sisulu has said a comprehensive programme dealing with human settlement and social infrastructure will be presented to Cabinet within two months. This programme will deal with the rehabilitation of informal settlements and an enhanced approach to medium density housing. In the next three years, government will spend R14.2 billion to help people have access to basic shelter. From this financial year, it will also address the trend in some provinces where there has been a slow-down in housing delivery as well as addressing the broader question of spatial settlement patterns and implications of this in our efforts to build a non-racial society. The department of housing has embarked on a programme to improve rural housing to make sure that they comply with at least the minimum health and safety as well as quality standards. The department of housing is embarking on a capacity building programme for local authorities to align housing functions with the integrated development planning process. Increased capacity will, among others, help enhance delivery in the provinces and local authorities. The informal settlement redevelopment strategy will be implemented together with the broader strategy for urban renewal. Through the Job Summit Pilot Presidential Rental Housing Projects and the implementation of the Urban Renewal Projects in areas such as Alexandra in Johannesburg and Umlazi in Durban, government has learnt much about the reconstruction of communities and human settlements in an integrated manner. Informal settlement upgrading and the delivery of large-scale rental housing can play a significant role in urban renewal. It will give people an opportunity to select housing options that meet their respective needs and help deal with informal settlements that already exist. This will allow government to pay more attention to the renewal of the inner city areas and to so-called dysfunctional communities. |
More Information:
|
|
Global AIDS, TB and malaria fund clarifies comments on SA funding The executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Professor Richard Feacham, has written to the Ministry of Health apologising for "any irritation and pressure caused" by his comments to the media about the funding of South African programmes. Prof Feacham told the media that the South African government was delaying the disbursement of Global Fund grants to local beneficiaries. He indicated that the Global Fund was, therefore, considering reviewing its funding for South Africa and would channel resources directly to local beneficiaries. He was quoted as saying: "It's intolerable that the money gets stuck in Pretoria and if Pretoria can't move it for any reason, we will simply withdraw it and establish direct relationships with the people actually doing the work." The Minister of Health, Dr Manto Tshabalala-Msimang wrote to Prof Feacham refuting these claims and giving precise details of grant received and transferred to local organisations. Prof Feacham's failure to discuss the matters directly with the South African government and resorting to the media as the first avenue of communication was also unacceptable. The Global Fund was also reminded of the fact that grants for the second and third round allocations had yet to be disbursed by the Fund. Prof Feacham has since written to Tshabalala-Msimang and "expressed my apologies for any irritation and pressure caused by my comment to the media in London last week". "I fully agree with your view that discussions on grant implementation issues should not be conducted through the media. We will do our part to avert any such situations in the future." He attached the statement issued by the Global Fund on the matter, which reads as follows: "Given substantial media attention around comments made by the Global Fund Executive Director Richard Feachem to the South African Broadcasting Corporation and later statements by the South African Government, the Global Fund would like to clarify its position on the current status of its grants to South Africa. "Contrary to speculation in the media, the Global Fund is not threatening to withdraw any funds from South Africa. Collaboration between the Global Fund and the South African Government is productive and positive. Furthermore, through its seat on the Global Fund Board, South Africa plays an important role in the governance of the Global Fund. "We are encouraged by recent progress and are confident that the programmes supported by the Global Fund will contribute substantially to South Africa's struggle with HIV/AIDS. "The Global Fund remains committed to working with the South African Government to find joint solutions to bottlenecks in order to ensure rapid and efficient implementation of the Global Fund-financed programs in South Africa. "To date, the Global Fund has approved proposals for HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care worth US$234 million over five years to South Africa. The Global Fund is a unique global public-private partnership dedicated to attracting and disbursing additional resources to prevent and treat AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. This partnership between governments, civil society, the private sector and affected communities represents a new approach to international health financing. The Fund works in close collaboration with other bilateral and multilateral organisations to supplement existing efforts dealing with the three diseases. The Global Fund has so far committed $2.1 billion to 225 programs in 121 countries. "The Global Fund has been established as an independent private foundation governed by an international Board. Apart from a high standard of technical quality, the Global Fund attaches no conditions to any of its grants. It is not an implementing agency. It relies on local ownership and planning to ensure that new resources are directed to programs on the frontline of this global effort, reaching those most in need. Its performance-based approach to grant-making - where grants are only disbursed if progress has been measured and verified - is designed to ensure that funds are used efficiently and create real change for people and communities. All programmes are monitored by independent organisations contracted by the Global Fund to ensure that its funding has real impact in the fight against the three pandemics. The South African government said it was satisfied that all misconceptions on the projected supported by the Global Fund had been clarified. |
More Information: |