South Africans of all races will vote for a people's contract
THIS IS the last edition of ANC TODAY ahead
of the April 14th elections. We would therefore like to take this opportunity
to wish all our people peaceful and successful elections. Once more we
urge all the political parties contesting the elections to do everything
possible to contribute to this outcome.
We also extend our best wishes to the Independent Electoral
Commission (IEC) and its entire staff to continue to discharge its responsibilities
to our country and people to ensure that we hold and free elections, as
it has done in the past. We will also continue to count on all our country's
security forces and agencies to support the IEC in this regard.
We would also like to urge that all the political parties
participating in the elections should deploy party agents in the voting
stations as provided for in the IEC procedures. This must be done to assist
the IEC to ensure that the elections are both free and fair and are accepted
by all, including the political parties, as having been free and fair.
It is clear that some parties are preparing for their possible
defeat in a special way. They are hoping that they can concoct sufficient
"evidence" to argue that their defeat is due to fraudulent activity.
The deployment of party agents, who will monitor the voting process and
verify the vote count, will play an important part in defeating the schemes
of those who, for purely partisan purposes, will try to discredit our
hard-won democratic system by attempting to deny the fact of their rejection
by the people.
Again, the security forces, working with the people and all organised
formations committed to the protection of the democratic victory, will
have to do their best to ensure that these party agents are not exposed
to violence and intimidation by those who want to win votes by resort
to illegal means.
As we have said before, our country enters its Second Decade of Liberation
with great possibilities to record important victories in the continuing
struggle to defeat poverty and underdevelopment. And as our movement has
said, this will require, among other things, that our country unite in
a people's contract to bring together the capacities of all our people
to confront the common challenge to build a winning nation.
The achievement of this objective demands that we ensure that the government
that leads our country derives its legitimacy from the free expression
of the will of the people. This obliges us to ensure that the forthcoming
elections are truly free and fair, and are accepted by the masses of our
people as having been truly free and fair.
This will enhance the possibility for the new government to mobilise the
people into the united national movement for progressive change represented
by the concept of a people's contract.
The question of the response of the people to the national challenges
of our democracy has been one of the central issues defining the role
and place of the various political formations in the reconstruction and
development of our country. Naturally, the 2004 elections have brought
this matter to the fore, as each of these formations has sought to win
the support of the people.
Throughout its history, the ANC has understood and projected the view
that our people, black and white, are confronted by a number of common
challenges. Convinced that our country belongs to all who live in it and
that, regardless of differences of race, colour and culture, our citizens
share a common destiny, our movement has for more than nine decades fought
for the unity of all our people in the struggle to determine that shared
destiny.
Pixley ka Isaka Seme presented this view as early as 1911 when he and
his fellow patriots were working to convene the founding conference of
the ANC on January 8th, 1912. In an article in the newspaper "Imvo
Zabantsundu", explaining the purposes of the "Native Union"
that was still to be, he wrote: "There is today among all races and
men a general desire for progress, and for cooperation, because cooperation
will facilitate and secure that progress.Cooperation is the key and the
watchword which opens the door, the everlasting door which leads into
progress and all national success. The greatest success shall come when
man shall have learned to cooperate, not only with his own kith and kin,
but with all peoples and with all life."
The 1944 Manifesto of the ANC Youth League contains the following interesting
observation: "The African regards the Universe as one composite whole;
an organic entity, progressively driving towards greater harmony and unity,
whose individual parts exist merely as interdependent aspects of one whole,
realising their fullest life in the corporate life where communal contentment
is the absolute measure of values. His philosophy of life strives towards
unity and aggregation; towards greater social responsibility."
In its January 8th, 1982 Statement marking the 70th anniversary of our
movement, the ANC NEC said: "We have striven for seven decades to
build one common nationhood with one destiny.All of us - workers, peasants,
students, priests, chiefs, traders, teachers, civil servants, poets, writers,
men, women and youth, black and white, must take our common destiny into
our own hands."
In the document "Ready to Govern", adopted at the 1992 National
Conference of the ANC, we said: "We have to develop a truly South
African vision of our country, one which is not distorted by the prejudices
and sectarianism that have guided viewpoints on race and gender in the
past. We have to rely on the wisdom, life experiences, talents and know-how
of all South Africans, men and women. There can be no 'apartheid' in finding
solutions to the problems created by apartheid."
The sentiments expressed so eloquently in 1911, 1944, 1982 and 1992, for
cooperation with all peoples and all life, for unity and aggregation,
for building one common nationhood with one destiny, for the development
of a truly South African vision of our country, find their expression
today in the people's contract that our movement has presented to our
country.
Opposed to this perspective in whose defence many sacrificed their lives,
is the view advanced by some of the political formations in our country
that the central task facing the masses of our country is to divide into
two opposing political factions that must engage in an endless struggle
to gain supremacy one over the other.
Our movement upholds the view that the central challenge facing the masses
of our people is voluntarily to use the space created by our democratic
system to act in unity "to build one common nationhood with one destiny".
Our opponents propagate the view that the masses of our people should
use this space to polarise themselves into contending entities with no
shared destiny. They characterise the entrenched national division for
which they are working as the very essence of our democracy.
White minority power in our country, in all its forms and manifestations,
was necessarily always founded on the division and polarisation of our
people and the denial of our common nationhood, sharing one destiny.
Whereas our movement has always urged progress for our country achieved
through cooperation "among all races and men", our oppressors
have treated this movement as an opponent that must be defeated and destroyed.
Thus they decreed that not only the survival of the system of white minority
rule, but also the very welfare of white society depended on the interaction
between our movement and themselves as opposing entities.
This approach finds expression today in the view advanced by some opposition
parties that the litmus test defining whether we have a genuine democracy
or not is the strength of the Opposition, and therefore the division of
our country into permanently antagonistic camps.
The principal task of this Opposition is then defined as opposing everything
the government does, with no concern about participating in the effort
to address the fundamental challenge our country faces to eradicate the
legacy of colonialism and apartheid.
This leads naturally to the result that the weakening of the ANC, "cutting
it down to size", has become the beginning and the end of the campaigns
of these opposition parties, rather than the projection of their programmes.
This opposition at all costs will then be extended to the period after
the elections.
The ANC is determined to unite our people in the struggle to build a non-racial
society, speaking for all South Africans. However, some among the Opposition
are equally determined to emphasise our racial and ethnic divisions, to
polarise our country along these lines, informed by the "prejudices
and sectarianism" of the past.
To this end, these opposition parties claim special status as representatives
not of our people as a whole, but of particular ethnic or racial groups.
They argue against affirmative action, such interventions as the Employment
Equity Act, minimum wages and other measures for the protection of workers'
rights.
They assert that individual merit should be the determinant of what happens
to each South African, knowing very well that the persisting impact of
the legacy of the past denies the majority of our population the possibility
to compete on an equal basis with those who were advantaged by the apartheid
system.
All this is nothing but a camouflaged message that black upliftment is
contrary to the interests of the white section of our population. By this
means, these opposition groupings indicate their opposition to the perspective
projected by the ANC that "there can be no 'apartheid' in finding
solutions to the problems created by apartheid."
They continue to advance a particular view about what we should do with
our democracy, basing themselves on what the ANC characterised as an approach
that is "distorted by the prejudices and sectarianism that have guided
viewpoints on race and gender in the past."
Necessarily therefore, one of the central issues that will face the electorate
during the 2004 Elections will be to decide whether we want to conduct
ourselves as a diverse but united nation, or prefer to divide ourselves
into polarised and competing political, ethnic and racial factions.
The electorate will have to decide whether it agrees with the ANC when
it says that to achieve our goal of providing a better life for all, "we
have to rely on the wisdom, life experiences, talents and know-how of
all South Africans, men and women" and that all of us "workers,
peasants, students, priests, chiefs, traders, teachers, civil servants,
poets, writers, men, women and youth, black and white, must take our common
destiny into our own hands."
The votes this electorate will cast on April 14 will indicate whether
it believes that we should perpetuate the racial, ethnic and gender divisions
of the past, making the statement that we should use the apartheid divisions
of the past to "find solutions to the problems created by apartheid."
The key challenge facing our electorate is not whether our country should
have "a strong opposition" or not, responding to a fictional
threat of a one-party state. The key question is whether our people, black
and white, men and women, are ready to give further impetus to the process
of national reconciliation by acting together in unity in a people's contract
focused on building a caring, people-centred and winning nation.
We have no doubt that South Africans of all races will vote to return
the ANC to power with a decisive majority, and thus vote in favour of
the people 's contract that will further reinforce the process of national
reconciliation for the promotion of social transformation.
By this means, our people will make the unequivocal statement that they
reject the dismal vision of some of those who define themselves as the
Opposition, of a South Africa that would continue to be characterised
by the divisions, tensions and conflicts deliberately created and entrenched
by the apartheid system.

|