Litany of lies shows lack of respect for the people
Our 2004 Election Manifesto, entitled 'A People's Contract to Create Work
and Fight Poverty', includes our Vision 2014, projecting into the future
of our country to the end of the Second Decade of Freedom.
In terms of that Vision, we say: "Guided by
the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), our vision is to build
a society that is truly
united, non-racial, non-sexist and democratic. Central to this is a single
and integrated economy that benefits all.
"The combination of some of the most important
targets and objectives making up Vision 2014 are as follows:
- Reduce unemployment by half;
- Reduce poverty by half;
- Provide the skills required by the economy;
- Ensure that all South Africans
are fully able to exercise their constitutional rights and enjoy the full dignity
of freedom;
- Compassionate government service to the people;
- Massively reduce cases of TB, diabetes, malnutrition and maternal deaths,
and turn the tide against HIV and AIDS, and working with the rest of
Southern Africa, strive to eliminate malaria;
- Significantly reduce the number of serious and priority crimes as
well as cases awaiting trial; and,
- Position South Africa strategically
as an effective force in global relations."
During the First Decade of Liberation, we paid the necessary attention to
the elaboration of the policies we require to achieve these objectives. These
policies have also been translated into legislation in instances where such
legislation was required.
The 2002 ANC Policy Conference that preceded our 51st National Conference
reviewed our policies within the context of the pursuit of the goals of the
RDP. It came to the conclusion that, in the main, we had put in place the
policies our country needs to overcome the legacy of colonialism and apartheid,
and create a united, non-racial, non-sexist, prosperous and democratic South
Africa.
Our Stellenbosch 51st National Conference confirmed this assessment and
view. It drew attention to the central importance of ensuring that we implement
our policies in a manner that produces the kind of South Africa we, together
with the masses of our people, visualise.
When we opened the last session of the Second Democratic Parliament in February
this year, the last during our First Decade of Freedom, we restated this
view, based on a detailed review of what we had done during the first ten
years of liberation.
Specifically we said: "We would like to restate
this matter unequivocally that the policies we required to translate what
President Mandela said in
May 1994 are firmly in place. Accordingly, we do not foresee that there will
be any need for new and major policy initiatives. The task we will all face
during the decade ahead will be to ensure vigorous implementation of these
policies, to create the winning people-centred society of which Nelson Mandela
spoke. We already have the policies and programmes that will enable us to
translate all (our) strategic objectives into a material factor in achieving
the goals of the expansion of the frontiers of human fulfilment, and the
continuous extension of the frontiers of the freedom of which Nelson Mandela
spoke a decade ago."
The policies and programmes we were speaking of are
not a mere wish list of what we would like to see. They exist in concrete
form, taking into account
where we are today. They are therefore designed within the context of the
resources we will be able to generate to ensure that the peoples' hopes are
transformed into reality. In other words, they are not a "thumb suck",
optimistic promises that are not based on what our country can do practically.
Those who define themselves as our opponents, whose stated goal during the
April Elections is to gain more votes so that they become a stronger opposition
to the ANC, have also put their own policies on the table. These are the
political parties that refuse to become part of the People's Contract to
Create Work and Fight Poverty, determined to oppose the united action of
the people of South Africa to build a better life for all.
The policies some of them advance are nothing more than mere wish lists
intended to project these parties as organisations that are concerned to
improve the lives of our people. The reality is that if ever these were implemented,
they would impose a financial burden that would plunge our economy into crisis.
Members of the ANC Economic Transformation Commission (ETC) have, for instance,
examined some of the manifesto proposals made by the DA. These include a
basic income grant, the abolition of certain taxes, corporate deductions
for new employees, and the so-called opportunity and bursary vouchers.
The ETC members have established that taken together, these interventions
would cost just over R30 billion, or 2,3 percent of the GDP. They would result
in a budget deficit amounting to R72 billion, or 5,4 percent of the GDP.
Additional interest costs of just these proposals after five years would
amount to an additional R16 billion annually.
All this would necessitate ever more borrowing, increasing the debt burden
on the country and future generations, or increased taxes that would take
away more of the peoples' earnings and discourage higher levels of investment,
economic growth and development.
From all this, it is perfectly obvious that the
promises made by the DA are far removed from reality and anything that
can actually be done without
driving the economy into a serious crisis.
For this reason, the DA is unable to tell the electorate honestly how it
proposes to fund its promises, in a manner that would not create enormous
economic problems. It cannot tell the truth in this regard because this would
expose its manifesto as being nothing more than a set of empty promises.
Accordingly, it finds that the truth does not serve its interests and therefore
does not want the truth to be known.
We for our part have said "we already have the
policies and programmes that will enable us to translate all (our) strategic
objectives into a material
factor in achieving the goals of the expansion of the frontiers of human
fulfilment, and the continuous extension of the frontiers of the freedom."
We have the policies and programmes to achieve the objectives stated in
Vision 2014. These have been properly costed, taking into account the current
and projected performance of our economy and other relevant factors. Together,
these objectives constitute a balanced package of measures that will be implemented
in such a manner that they do not produce unforeseen or hidden negative social
and economic consequences.
In this regard, we have made certain that we do not
project deceitful and populist positions, merely to win votes in the forthcoming
elections. Indeed
none of those who identify themselves as our opponents, "the opposition",
have the possibility successfully to challenge our policies and programmes
on the basis of their being unrealistic and impracticable.
Because of this, every other day they cook up one or another issue to add
to their armoury of weapons they use to try to weaken the ANC and increase
their popularity. In this regard, they do not hesitate to resort to blatant
falsehoods.
For example, on 1 March, the DA issued a statement
saying "President
Mbeki is even considering appointing three deputies during his next term
of office in order to settle internal power struggles within the ANC".
This was an unadulterated lie.
On 4 March, it repeated the false assertion that
the Defence Procurement has been "plagued (with the issue of corruption) since its inception".
The truth is that the Auditor General, the Public Protector and the National
Director of Public Prosecutions investigated these allegations and found
that they have no substance whatsoever. They said as much in the Report they
submitted to Parliament.
None of the people who continue to repeat this allegation of corruption,
including the DA, has produced even one solitary fact to contradict this
Report. Nevertheless, because the propagation of falsehoods is an integral
part of the armoury of our opponents, they will not desist from repeating
a lie that was nailed a long time ago.
The cases in front of our courts related to the Procurement have absolutely
nothing to do with both the processes leading to, and the decision to acquire
the defence equipment we need to ensure that we have an effective National
Defence Force, as required by our Constitution.
On 7 March, the DA said "President Thabo Mbeki has said that economic
growth will not help South Africa to reduce inequality and poverty".
This was yet another outright lie. All I had said, which even a high school
student would understand, is that economic growth on its own would not solve
the problem of unemployment. This is for the simple and obvious reason that
the uneducated and unskilled will not find jobs in a growing economy that
demands people with skills, such as ours. This is the reason why we are paying
close attention to the task of skills and human resource development.
On 8 March, true to its support of the gangs that
illegally and unconstitutionally took up arms against the elected Government
of Haiti, it issued a statement
talking about "the Haiti arms shipment fiasco". Among other things,
it made the false claim that this shipment of police materials requested
by the Government of Haiti and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), supported
by major Western powers, had not been authorised by the National Conventional
Arms Control Committee.
On 9 March, the DA issued a xenophobic statement
falsely alleging that "the
ANC has done away with visa requirements for some 2,9 billion people behind
minister Mangosuthu Buthelezi's back". This referred to draft Immigration
Regulations that Minister Buthelezi had distributed to all Cabinet Ministers
and Deputy Ministers to facilitate their discussion.
The issue of these Regulations is now subject to
judicial processes and is therefore sub judice. The truth however is that
the Cabinet constituted
a Ministerial sub-committee, convened by Buthelezi, to consider these Regulations.
This process has not been completed. However the DA is not interested in
the truth. It therefore trumpets falsehoods about this issue, including the
naked lie that everything is being done "behind minister Buthelezi's
back".
On 11 March, the DA leader echoed the fabrication
that the SAPS would not hire Coloured police officers in the Western Cape,
citing what he described
as a Solidarity Report. Western Cape Community Safety MEC, Leonard Ramatlakane,
rejected this falsehood and said "I appeal to Leon not to mislead the
people of Atlantis and of Mitchell's Plain by playing the race card".
Trying to extract as much propaganda value as he
could from a lie, and adding another lie, Leon said: "This document
proves that sometimes brown or coloured people are counted in when it comes
to employment equity and affirmative
action, but more times than not they are counted out."
The DA even decided to lash out beyond the ANC, desperate to win votes at
any cost. It claimed that a person appearing in the Pretoria Magistrate's
Court charged with the unlawful possession of three Identity Documents was
the daughter of the Chairperson of the IEC, Dr Brigalia Bam. This particular
lie had very short legs, forcing the DA to apologise to Dr Bam, admitting
that it had lied.
We can of course cite other lies told by the DA. Undoubtedly it will manufacture
new ones in the weeks ahead, unable to market itself on the basis of the
policy options it has proposed. But naturally, it will do its best to try
to project itself as a party of integrity and probity.
For this reason, it has dredged up remarks made by Premier N.J. Mahlangu
many years ago, claiming that the Premier said it was permissible for politicians
to lie. But even in this regard, it finds it impossible to tell the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The matter at issue relates to a statement made by
Mahlangu in 1999, reported in one newspaper under the headline "Lying OK in politics says premier".
In his Finding, the Public Protector said "I also find that he has
been misquoted in general as saying that it is in order ("OK")
for politicians to lie, when in fact he did state that: "I am not saying
that it is correct."
However, the Public Protector went on to say: "However,
Mr Mahlangu went further and stated, with reference to Pres. Bill Clinton,
that 'the
circumstances of denial are important. It matters what causes a person to
deny. I am not sure whether it was frustration if a person feels I must admit
what I have done, and he admits. I don't find it to be a very bad thing.' "
The Public Protector objected to this latter statement,
for which the Premier had apologised. In his Report, the Public Protector
said "Mr Mahlangu
also emphasised during our meeting that it is in fact completely unacceptable
to him that a person should lie and that he pertinently stated his conviction
in this regard at the media conference."
Undoubtedly the DA has access to the Public Protector's Report. However,
it knows that if it told the truth about what this Report says, it would
deny itself the opportunity to pretend that all that an ANC Premier said
was that it was in order for politicians to lie.
Premier Mahlangu apologised for the wrong statement
he made, that he did not find it "a very bad thing" for people
to tell a lie and later correct this. I suspect that our country and people
will never see the DA
demonstrate its respect for them, by apologising for the litany of lies it
produces, as it tries in desperation to win a few extra votes.

|