Time to honour our commitment
to reconciliation
Earlier
this week an important Debate took place in our national
parliament. This was on the occasion of the tabling by the President
of the Republic of the final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission. In addition to the government, this gave an opportunity
to all our political parties to indicate what they would do to
respond to the critical challenge of national unity and national
reconciliation.
Happily, with the exception of only one party,
which has clearly still not learnt how to respond to the common
national challenges, all parties joined the government in committing
themselves to the accomplishment of these goals. This constituted
a fitting tribute to the TRC and all our people who had participated
and contributed to its work.
It also vindicated the correctness of the positions
our movement took as we negotiated the transition from apartheid
white minority domination to a non-racial democracy. Then, we
had to take a centrally important strategic decision.
The apartheid system constituted a crime against
humanity. It should therefore have been as criminally punishable
as German Nazism, the genocide in Rwanda and Cambodia, and the
war crimes that had been committed in some of the countries that
constitute the former Yugoslavia.
The question that faced us as we participated
in the 1990-1994 negotiations was whether the new democracy should
constitute the sort of Nuremberg war tribunal that followed the
defeat of Nazism and the courts trying the genocidaires.
We decided against this. Rather, we opted for
the process expressed in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
The reason we took this position was very easy to understand,
and decisive in its implications.
We decided that it was in the interest of all
our people, black and white, and our country, that we end the
conflict that had gripped our country since the arrival of the
European settlers in 1652.
We concluded that if those who had sustained the
apartheid crime against humanity and committed specific gross
violations of human rights within this context, were faced with
arrest and possible imprisonment, they would have no choice but
to take up arms to resist the transition to a non-racial democracy.
Undoubtedly, they would lose in the end. But the
cost in human lives and property, and an entrenched racial enmity
among our people would be intolerably high. To impose such a cost
on the people would have been fundamentally in conflict with the
most basic founding principles of our movement, which have always
focused on the assertion of the right of all our people to the
inalienable right of every individual to life.
For this reason, we had, as long as we could,
resisted the decision to adopt the strategy of armed struggle,
to confront an intransigent regime that had taken steps to make
a peaceful resolution of the conflict between apartheid and democracy
impossible.
Even when we decided to resort to arms, we adopted
and sustained the policy position and practice that we should,
at all costs, avoid the loss of civilian lives. We formally adopted
the Geneva Conventions governing the conduct of warfare, to bind
ourselves to the humane obligations these Conventions seeks to
entrench.
Despite all this, during the negotiations, we
also had to recognise the fact that millions of our people had
suffered immensely, both from the apartheid crime against humanity
and specific gross violations of human rights, committed within
this context. Even as we sought to end a violent conflict that
had persisted for centuries, we could neither forget nor minimise
the pain of those who had been its victims, some of whom were
understandably demanding the kind of justice meted out at Nuremberg.
The TRC was constituted and mandated in the manner
it was, to help our country achieve the necessary and delicate
balance between the imperative to end the historical conflict
in our country, and to address the legitimate expectations for
justice on the part of those who had borne the pain of repression.
Whatever its admitted faults and defects, it did its best to help
our country to realise this necessary and delicate balance. Certainly,
the masses of our people accepted the alternative it presented.
This is one of the reasons we did not and will
not have any race riots inspired by the urge to punish the former
oppressors and beneficiaries of oppression, for the pain they
imposed on the majority of our people. We therefore have every
reason to celebrate the TRC and its work, and to do what we can
to implement those of its recommendations that we have accepted.
A critically important element of what informed
the fundamental perspective of the TRC was the conviction that,
in the medium and longer term, the peace and justice we sought
could only be achieved through the pursuit and realisation of
the goals of national unity and national reconciliation.
Accordingly, the acceptance by all our people
of the solution offered by the route of the TRC rather than any
other, meant that we also committed ourselves to work together
to bring about such unity and reconciliation. Now that the TRC
has concluded its work, all of us, black and white, are confronted
with the challenge to answer the question, what we shall do to
help realise these goals. This is the other factor in the equation
representative of our celebration of the TRC.
Accordingly, the time has come for us to meet
the obligations with regard to the contract we entered into among
ourselves as South Africans, when we agreed to the TRC and its
processes.
This obligation was referred to in the Interim
Constitution we adopted in 1993, as indicated by the TRC Act,
in the following words:
".the Constitution states that the pursuit
of national unity, the well-being of all South African citizens
and peace require reconciliation between the people of South Africa
and the reconstruction of society."
Those who were central to the adoption of this
vision, the patriots who fought for our liberation, who chose,
voluntarily, to sacrifice everything to free our people, have
continued to stand out as an outstanding example of what it means
to be a true South African patriot.
The challenge we all face is to emulate that patriotism,
as we confront the tasks ahead of us. This means that we must
respond willingly, consciously and selflessly to the objective,
together to transform the vision spelt out in both the Interim
and the current Constitutions into reality.
As we all know, an important element of our national
contract with regard to the TRC, was the provision of reparations
to those who would be identified as victims of gross human rights
violations committed in the period since the Sharpeville Massacre
of 1960. In this regard, the TRC said of the liberators and patriots
I have just mentioned:
"Others did not wish to be portrayed as a
'victim'. Indeed, many said expressly that they regarded themselves
instead as soldiers who had voluntarily paid the price of their
struggle.Many have expressed reservations about the very notion
of a 'victim', a term which is felt to denote a certain passivity
and helplessness. Military operatives of the liberation movements
generally did not report violations they experienced to the Commission,
although many who were arrested experienced severe torture. This
is in all likelihood a result of their reluctance to be seen as
'victims', as opposed to combatants fighting for a moral cause
for which they were prepared to suffer such violations. The same
can be said for most prominent political activists and leadership
figures.The Commission did not, for example, receive a single
Human Rights Violation statement from any of the Rivonia trialists."
All these, the liberation fighters drawn from
all our fronts of struggle, made the important statement that
they engaged in struggle to ensure that South Africa belongs to
all who live in it, black and white. They did this as both a moral
and a patriotic duty. For this they expected no financial or material
reward. The only reparations they sought, was the emancipation
of all our people from the apartheid crime against humanity. These
same patriots had borne the brunt of the brutal repression visited
on our struggling people by the apartheid regime.
Yet when the time came, they took the decision
that they did not want vengeance against their former enemies,
but reconciliation among the people of South Africa and the reconstruction
of our society. It is they who decided against following the route
of the Nuremberg Trials, choosing the more difficult option of
the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Once more, when the time came, they elected to
bear all the physical and psychological wounds they had to endure,
without demanding that they be rewarded with money, services or
material goods for having dared to stand up for the freedom of
our people.
By so doing, they set an example for all of us,
to identify what is moral and right with regard to the interests
of the people, and to act to achieve what is moral and right for
the greater good, without seeking personal gain.
No greater sacrifices could have been asked of
any of our people. Neither can we pay a greater tribute to these
patriots than to build on the victory they brought about through
their selflessness. Consequently, the question each South African
must answer is - what must I do to discharge this obligation!
Throughout their fighting lives, these patriots
depended on their strength and the determination of the masses
of our people to defeat apartheid tyranny. They never thought,
nor worked on the basis, that the rest of the world would liberate
us, even as they strived to develop a powerful international solidarity
movement, and deeply appreciated its role and support.
Throughout their fighting lives, they always valued
the sovereign right of our people to determine their future, refusing
that this future should be decided by others from other lands,
however powerful these others might be.
Throughout their fighting lives, they sought the
unity of all our people, black and white, encouraging all South
Africans to come together to defeat tyranny, and, later, to combine
their efforts for the reconstruction and development of our country.
In this regard, they always respected the right of every South
African to hold any view of their choice, while working within
a broad front to achieve common and agreed objectives.
The decision to establish the TRC, the objectives
it pursued, the outcomes it has achieved, the challenges it has
set, all reflect these fundamental convictions that informed the
patriots who fought for our liberation throughout their lives.
There are others in our country, our historical
ideological and political opponents, who have always worked for
the defeat of our movement. These, and their predecessors, have
consistently contested and sought to defeat our ideas and programmes,
grabbing any opposing idea or programme that might be at hand.
Ever since our liberation, they have tried to
fight against our transformation programme by threatening us with
disapproval by the international community. They have worked hard
to convince the masses of our people and ourselves, that we should
derive our benchmarks for success from supposed international
norms.
Their favourite threat is that what we are doing
to transform our country is driving away foreign investment. They
have written often about how political leaders elsewhere in the
world are supposedly embarrassed to have to deal with a South
African political leadership that does not meet so-called international
standards.
They have felt no sense of shame in seeking to
compromise our nation's right to self-determination, arguing that
the need to fill our empty stomachs, through the assistance of
the international community, should take precedence over the exercise
of that right.
The strange thing is that as we made our responses
to the recommendations of the TRC, these same people turned reality
on its head. Unable to argue against and defeat the outcome of
the historic positions of the patriots who fought for our liberation,
some of them now use the mass media to claim these positions as
their own.
Suddenly, it is they who are the best representatives
of our nation's right to self-determination. Accordingly, they
extend a condescending welcome to our supposedly newfound commitment
to our people's right to self-determination, as well as our similarly
newfound recognition of the need for unity in action.
Our ideological and political opponents have not
abandoned their strategic goal to wage war against us, for our
defeat. To achieve this objective, they have decided to appropriate
the victories of the patriots who fought to liberate our country,
as theirs. Thus do the wolves, dressed in sheepskin, hope to catch
their prey, the masses that spared neither life nor limb, to achieve
their own liberation.
Others wiser than us have said that the enemy
manoeuvres, but it remains the enemy.
The task ahead of us is to follow the lead and
example of the great heroes and heroines, the liberation fighters,
whose reparations are nothing more, or less, than the genuine
emancipation of our people. Times and circumstances change, obliging
our liberation movement to manoeuvre, and yet we remain the same
movement of the patriots who brought us freedom and gave birth
to the TRC.
Our task is to unite all our people to respect
the national contract they all entered into as they agreed to
the establishment of the TRC. With the exception of one political
party, all the elected representatives in our national parliament
undertook to honour this contract. The time has come for that
contract to be translated into action, despite the wishes of the
wolves in sheepskin.

|